S, even though by Bezzia nobilis in freshwater ones. Densities of marine
S, while by Bezzia nobilis in freshwater ones. Densities of marine organisms were high only in brackish lakes in summer season. In lakes permanently connected with the sea, probably the most abundant marine species was Hydrobia ulvae, whereas in periodically connected ones, Gammarus oceanicus. Benthic fauna reached the highest density in a brackish lake (Resko) and was the lowest within a transitional 1 (Kopan) (Figure four). The abundance of benthic organisms was the highest in brackish costal lakes (x = 760 indiv. m-2 ), exactly where the marine component of fauna have been identified. Due to the greatest instability of environmental conditions, the lowest abundance (x = 300 indiv. m-2 ) was found in lakes periodically linked with all the sea (transitional). Significant differences in density were identified among brackish and transitional lakes (R = 0.060, p = 0.027) and freshwater and transitional lakes (R = 0.053, p = 0.029). Opposing Inositol nicotinate Epigenetic Reader Domain salinity regimes (freshwater vs. brackish water) resulted in related Animals 2021, 11, x FOR PEER Evaluation ten of 15 benthic fauna density values.Figure four. Density (103 three indiv. m-2) of benthic fauna for every single lake. Bar chart (standard error of mean) and dashed red line– Figure four. Density (ten indiv. m-2 ) of benthic fauna for every single lake. Bar chart (regular error of mean) and dashed red typical density for any lake kind. line–average density for any lake form.The overall information analysis (Figure five) confirmed a higher significance on the patterns In person lake types, substantial seasonal differences inside the abundance of benassociated were the level of environmental adjustments autumn, inside all groups: brackish thic fauna with observed only amongst spring and mean species richness (R = 0.37, p = 0.0001) andpmean density (R = 0.ten, p= 0.11, p was negatively correlated with thep = 0.003). (R = 0.070, = 0.024), transitional (R = 0.001) = 0.003), and freshwater (R = 0.12, variation in salinity, expressed as regular highest densities in brackishwithinin autumn, lakes for Opportunistic species reached the deviation of salinity values lakes the study in transieach sample. In the and in freshwater lakes in summer season. tional lakes in spring, case of -diversity, salinity gradient also strongly affected the variation general information animal communities (R = 0.55,high significance on the patterns assoThe in benthic evaluation (Figure five) confirmed a p = 0.0001). Nonetheless, correlations amongst other level of environmental and mean salinity values were=not statistically ciated with all the benthos descriptors alterations mean species richness (R 0.37, p = 0.0001) considerable. density (R = 0.10, p = 0.001) was negatively correlated with all the variation in and meansalinity, expressed as standard deviation of salinity values within the study lakes for 3-Chloro-5-hydroxybenzoic acid Autophagy eachAnimals 2021, 11,ten ofsample. Within the case of -diversity, salinity gradient also strongly impacted the variation in benthic animal communities (R = 0.55, p = 0.0001). Even so, correlations betweenof 15 other Animals 2021, 11, x FOR PEER Critique 11 benthos descriptors and imply salinity values weren’t statistically considerable.Figure five. Imply diversity (H’), imply number of species (S) and mean abundance (N) versus salinity Figure five. Imply diversity (H’), imply number of species (S) and imply abundance (N) versus salinity variance over the sampling occasions, blue lines indicate 95 confidence interval. variance over the sampling occasions, blue lines indicate 95 self-assurance interval.four. Discussion Contributions of numerous predictors to shaping th.
