Ior in Thai industry”, a decision-making framework for energy efficiency investment
Ior in Thai industry”, a decision-making framework for power efficiency investment is proposed [112], even though the Motivation, Capability,J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9,7 ofImplementation and Result (MCIR) framework was proposed by Chai and Yeo [46] to overcome Aztreonam Purity & Documentation barriers to power efficiency by way of a systems method. Cagno et al. [47] regarded external and internal barriers and also the actors affected by the barriers. They aimed to overcome and ascertain the overlap Sutezolid manufacturer involving barriers, the impact of barriers on firms’ decision-making, implicit responses along with the relationship amongst barriers. Prashar, [113] by implementing a PDCA (Plan, Do Verify, Act) cycle, encouraged a continuous investigation of power saving possibilities and connected energy saving activities (ESAs) to market power optimization, and by developing a management power efficiency maturity (EEM) framework, promoted a systematic and continuous integration of energy efficiency practices. 3. Methodology There is a lack of studies that address a systematic method to removing barriers to enhancing energy efficiency in the maritime cluster. In disciplines where established methodologies and analysis are lacking, the development of frameworks and conceptual styles are much more valuable, effective and efficient than robust and rigorous models [114,115]. The validity in the proposed conceptual framework may be supported by mathematical solutions. Figure 1 shows the investigation design and style and sequences with the study. Initially, a systematic literature assessment was performed from journals, conference proceedings, market and company reports in unique sectors as well as the maritime small business cycle. Barriers to power efficiency improvement from distinctive industries and sectors have been listed. In the second phase, several energy barriers in the list (the list made inside the previous phase) have been analyzed along with the barriers connected to energy efficiency improvement inside the shipbuilding sector had been identified. As a way to overcome the power barriers, it’s critical to take into account the surrounding qualities in the power sector. For that reason, within the third phase of the study, the authors carried out an comprehensive literature overview and identified and classified the most important and vital disciplines for solving the power efficiency issues in shipbuilding into five principal disciplines, namely, operations, policy and legislation, technologies and innovation, human variables (consisting of behavioral and organizational systems) and economics. The barriers (in the list in phase two) had been categorized below these 5 disciplines (see Figure two). In an effort to decrease the power gap, overcome the issue and prioritize the barriers within the 5 disciplines, four2 criteria had been selected: how extreme the barriers are, how easy it is to remove the barriers and how much effect they’ve on power efficiency and economic efficiency. On the other hand, it is important to note that the barriers within the categorized framework are interlinked, interrelated and interact with one another. Within the final step, the interactions amongst the barriers from various disciplines have already been clarified using two3 multi-criteria choice generating (MCDM)4 techniques, namely, fuzzy analytical hierarchy method (FAHP) and fuzzy various attribute group decision generating approach (FMAGDM)5 . The framework assists managers inside a fuzzy atmosphere to identify and rank the barriers in line with their preferences through a transdisciplinary strategy and to produce rationa.
