The quantity of one hundred causes the concrete mix to condense and decrease its air content material. The compression strength of concrete samples with sandgravel and sand asalt mixtures of aggregates made with the tested additive is higher than that obtained for the control samples. The usage of fly ash inside the array of 100 causes a slight enhance inside the water absorption of concrete samples made with both sand ravel and sand asalt mixes of aggregates. The addition of waste ashes increases the depth of water penetration of the samples of all tested concrete series. The addition of fly ash from biomass to concretes in amounts as much as 30 reduces the reduce in compression strength of those concretes soon after low-temperature resistance tests and does not bring about the formation of fragments, cracks and defects inside the sample. Additionally, concrete composites containing the addition of ash from biomass combustion, taking into account the crack of your composite and the penetration of water,2.3.four.5.Supplies 2021, 14,13 of6.don’t show a negative impact around the natural environment related to the leaching (release) of heavy metals in to the atmosphere. The use of waste ash includes a positive effect on the natural environment by reducing the demand for all-natural resources. The use of fly ash within the volume of 30 from the cement mass as a sand substitute, based on the type of aggregate mixture, reduces sand usage by 11520 kg/m3 , i.e., by about 150 .Author Contributions: Investigation, computer software, methodology, writing original draft preparation, J.J.; conceptualization, methodology, analysis, writing critique and editing, M.U. All authors have study and agreed towards the published version from the manuscript. Funding: This study received no external funding. Institutional Overview Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Information Availability Statement: The information presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank GDF SUEZ Polaniec for making waste components available for research. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no function in the design from the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing in the manuscript; or in the choice to publish the outcomes.
materialsArticleCherenkov Tianeptine sodium salt Protocol Radiation Detection on a LS Counter for 226Ra Determination in Water and Its Comparison with Other Typical MethodsIvana Stojkovi1 , Natasa Todorovi2,3, , Jovana Nikolov 2 , Branka Radulovi2 and Michele Guida 3,4 c c cFaculty of Technical Bomedemstat Data Sheet Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovia 6, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; c [email protected] Division of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovia 3, c 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; [email protected] (J.N.); [email protected] (B.R.) Department of Laptop or computer Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Applied Mathematics (DIEM), University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; [email protected] Institute of Building Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Riga Technical University, 1658 Riga, Latvia Correspondence: [email protected]: Stojkovi, I.; Todorovi, N.; c c Nikolov, J.; Radulovi, B.; Guida, M. c Cherenkov Radiation Detection on a LS Counter for 226 Ra Determination in Water and Its Comparison with Other Widespread Solutions. Supplies 2021, 14, 6719. https://doi.org/ ten.3390/ma14216719 Academic Editors: Salvatore Tudis.
