Xclude “Include patents” and “Include quotes”. The search resulted in 1079 hits for sound localization and 670 hits for sound lateralization. These contents had been sorted in descending order of relevance. The 1000 hits of the upper limit displayed in the top for sound localization as well as the 670 hits for sound lateralization have been investigated. Right after inspection of your URLs, it was found that 982 hits for sound localization and 653 hits for sound lateralization were valid for analysis, after excluding links that displayed a “Not found” or “Not connected” message. These hit numbers were set as the initial values for screening for this assessment. The screening method along with the variety of resulting hits are shown in Figure 1. As a result, nine scientific articles for the assessment of sound localization and five for sound lateralization had been picked up. The five articles for sound lateralization, having said that, had been the identical as the nine articles for localization, so these nine articles were chosen. Additionally, the nine articles for sound localization had been categorized into those with normal-hearing participants with Gamma-glutamylcysteine Data Sheet bilateral simulated CHL (three articles: Table 1) and those with bilateral CHL (six articles: Table 2).Audiol. Res. 2021,Table 1. Studies on sound localization or lateralization with bone conduction for simulated conductive hearing loss from 2012 to August 2021. No. Authors (Year) Participants Devices Stimuli Presentation Levels Setup Twelve loudspeakers (aligned within a horizontal circular set up: an angular interval of 30 ) Test Conditions Evaluation of BCD1 (ADHEAR), comparison among unilateral and bilateral fitting, and comparison between BCD1 and BCD2 (Baha 5) (i) Unaided, (ii) aided with 1 BAHS sound processor mounted on a SoundArc, (iii) aided with 2 BAHS sound processors on a single SoundArc, (iv) aided with one BAHS sound processor on a softband, and (v) aided with 2 BAHS sound processors on a single soft band Typical hearing, unilateral plug, unilateral plug + ipsilateral aBCD, unilateral plug +ipsilateral aBCD+ contralateral pinna mold, bilateral plugs, bilateral plugs + bilateral aBCDs, and bilateral plugs + unilateral aBCDGawliczek et al. (2018a) [21]15 participants with induced bilateral CHLaBCD(s) (ADHEAR) and BCD(s) attached to a softband (Baha5)White noise (200 ms duration)Between 60 and 65 dB SPLGawliczek et al. (2018b) [22]15 participants with simulated bilateral CHL using a mixture of ear plugs and silicon mould materialBCD(s) (Baha5) (SoundArc along with a softband)White noise (200 ms duration)60, 65, and 70 dB SPLTwelve loudspeakers (aligned in a horizontal circular set up: an angular interval of 30 )Snapp et al. (2020) [23]11 listeners with simulated CHL with plug(s)aBCD(s) (ADHER)Broadband (BB; 0.50 kHz), high-pass (HP; 30 kHz), and Thiacloprid custom synthesis low-pass (LP; 0.5.5 kHz) noise bursts (150 ms duration)45, 55, and 65 dB ATwenty-four loudspeakers (the horizontal (0 ) and vertical (+40 /-30 ) planes (The speakers had been covered by a black, sound emitting curtain)Abbreviations: aBCD, adhesive bone conduction device; BAHS, bone-anchored hearing systems; CHL, conductive hearing loss.Audiol. Res. 2021,Table two. Studies on sound localization or lateralization with bone conduction device(s) for bilateral conductive hearing loss from 2012 to August 2021.No. Authors (Year) Participants 10 young children with extreme bilateral CHL on account of congenital big or minor ear anomalies with microtia or anotia or as a consequence of resistant chronic inflammation 32 individuals with conge.
